

PS - There is no assumption for the distribution of X or Y. Error terms are independent of each other e. RSE : Residual squared error = sqrt(RSS/n-2)ħ. These are based on a 25 second exponential weighted moving average. Bikescore (TSS), Relative Intensity RI (IF) and Skiba VI. Golden Cheetah uses the metrics created by Phil Skiba. In case of TSS it is the mean of the predicted values of the actual data points.Ħ. Post 4 of 6 (7379 views) yawg wrote: TSS, IF and VI are based on normalized power created by Andy Coggan. In the case of RSS, it is the predicted values of the actual data points. The difference in both the cases are the reference from which the diff of the actual data points are done. PS : Whenever you compute TSS or RSS, you always take the actual data points of the training set. So, 1-RSS/TSS is considered as the measure of robustness of the model and is known as R² This implies that the model is more robust. Lesser is this ratio lesser is the residual error with actual values, and greater is the residual error with the mean. The ration of RSS/TSS gives how good is the model as compared to the mean value without variance. When independent variable is added the model performance is given by RSS. This gives how good is the model without any independent variable. Learning all the time.TSS works as a cost function for a model which does not have an independent variable, but only y intercept (mean ȳ). The defaults included TriScore (which gives a figure very similar to TSS), xPower (which gave a figure very close to NP) and Relative Intensity (which gave a figure very close to Intensity Factor).Īll I need to do now is work out where Friel's decoupling figures are (I figure they are separated into Aerobic and Anaerobic Decoupling?) and then I'm nearly there, I think. I've now enabled them through the tools>options>metrics>summary tab, as they weren't there by default. I've worked out what was going on re me not being able to find the terms I was used to in GC (i.e. SportTracks (like Strava, and a few others) uses the Banister model. So you won't see the same chart - it's graphing different metrics, apples and oranges. The good news is that Man of Lard's sync order seems to have fixed the proper FTP in the app. SportTracks uses a different performance model than Training Peaks / Golden Cheetah. I think TSS and IF are used in calculations for the PMC whixh is a chart I find extremely useful for working out form and peaking for events. You will need to select 'Data Fields' option from preferences toolbar and then the 'fields' tab.
Goldencheetah where to find tss mac#
On Mac this is from the menu option GoldenCheetah->Preferences whilst on Windows and Linux it is under Tools->Options. I cannot see why you would want to pay for TP to be honest as GC is a very capable peice of analysis software. TSS) is not shown then you will need to add it via the GoldenCheetah preferences pane. Not sure what you mean about GC names, I have used GC for ages and IF and TSS are used terms. So arguably, it doesn't matter that the Garmin app has the wrong figures as I can just use the correct ones in Golden Cheetah, but I'd still like to understand why the Garmin is getting it wrong! So my breakthrough today is to discover that TSS is called TriScore in Golden Cheetah and Intensity Factor is called Relative Intensity in Golden Cheetah. I'm only slowly working out the different terminology used in Golden Cheetah compared with what I understand from Joe Friel's books. I'm a relatively experienced cyclist, but the intention for next year is to use the power meter data to train more effectively, and crucially to work out fatigue to enable me to peak for priority events. Supermurph, yes I'm a new power meter user and am so far using Golden Cheetah while I work out whether or not to subscribe to TrainingPeaks. It just seems to revert back to 200W as the default setting for its calculations - while on the bike, it uses the correct zones, it doesn't seem to carry these back into either the app or Garmin Connect itself.

I've tried again syncing in the order that Man of Lard suggests, and will try another ride and see if it uses the updated information. I'd also entered the data correctly in the 810 unit itself. I'd already been setting the data in Garmin Connect and syncing to the 810.
